Accrual Financial Reporting and Australian Fiscal Policy
Australian governments have recently moved from cash accounting to accrual accounting. In doing so they have made simultaneous use of two rival accrual accounting frameworks: AAS 31 and GFS. AAS 31 and GFS operating result measures differ significantly. To date, the AAS 31 framework has enjoyed primacy. This paper evaluates these two frameworks, and suggests that GFS is superior. Accrual accounting has been accompanied at the national government level by the introduction of a new key fiscal policy measure: the ‘fiscal balance’. This paper explains and evaluates this new fiscal measure. It concludes that, given the present fiscal policy of the Australian government, fiscal balance is a superior fiscal policy measure to the \'cash\' budget balance measure which it replaced. However, from the alternative ‘golden rule’ policy standpoint, fiscal balance is not a 1meaningful fiscal policy measurealthough its stock counterpart, net financial liabilities, is.
Year of publication: |
2000-11-20
|
---|---|
Authors: | Robinson, Marc |
Institutions: | School of Economics and Finance, Business School |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Tightening the Results/Funding Link in Performance Budgeting Systems
Robinson, Marc, (2003)
-
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING AND THE PUBLIC SECTOR
Robinson, Marc, (2000)
-
Accrual Output Budgeting in Australia
Robinson, Marc, (2002)
- More ...