Assessing the effectiveness of EU Member States’ practices in the identification, tracing, freezing and confiscation of criminal assets : Final Report
| Year of publication: |
2009-06-01
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Gunev, Filip ; Redhead, Matthew ; Irving, Barrie |
| Institutions: | matrix insight (contributor) |
| Publisher: |
Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
| Subject: | Best Practice | best practice | EU | Kriminalität | criminality | Verfahren | procedure | Vermögen | assets |
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Executive Summary
- 1.1 Aims and methods
- 1.2 Conclusions
- 1.3 Asset recovery statistics and performance measurement
- 1.4 Recommendations
- 2.0 Introduction
- 2.1 Report structure
- 3.0 Methodology
- 3.1 Legislation and literature review
- 3.2 Survey
- 3.3 Interviews and case studies
- 4.0 Legislative background and literature review
- 4.1 EU Legislation and reports
- 4.2 Academic literature review
- 4.3 Legislation overview
- 4.4 The role of European institutions
- 5.0 Findings
- 5.1 The investigative phase
- 5.2 The main drivers behind investigation
- 5.3 Lesser drivers
- 5.4 Obstacles to investigation: cooperation and capacity
- 5.5 Other obstacles to investigation: attitudes and investigative speed
- 5.6 Use of investigative tools
- 5.7 Asset tracing: obstacles and issues
- 5.8 International cooperation
- 5.9 The judicial phase
- 5.10 Judicial traditions
- 5.11 Obstacles: the importance of international cooperation
- 5.12 Obstacles: domestic and procedural issues
- 5.13 Process speed
- 5.14 Success and failure in the judicial phase
- 5.15 The disposal phase
- 5.16 Management of seized/confiscated assets
- 5.17 Disposal of assets and transfers to the state
- 5.18 Obstacles to disposal
- 6.0 Measuring the effectiveness of asset recovery
- 6.1 Measuring effectiveness
- 6.2 Measuring efficiency
- 7.0 Statistical data and measurement of asset recovery
- 7.1 Data availability
- 7.2 Data comparability
- 8.0 Policy options
- 9.0 Planned research tasks eliminated
- 10.0 Conclusions and recommendations
- 10.1 Conclusions
- 10.2 Asset recovery statistics and performance measurement
- 10.3 Recommendations
- 10.4 Case studies
- Appendix 1: United Kingdom – case study report
- Appendix 2: France – case study report
- Appendix 3: Bulgaria – case study report
- Appendix 4: Spain – case study report
- Appendix 5: Italy – case study report
- Appendix 6: Legislative basis for asset recovery
- Appendix 7: Vocabulary
- Appendix...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528107