Country of Origin Labeling (C.O.O.L.): How cool is it?
This paper develops a partial-equilibrium model of a small open-economy trading an unsafe product. The model is used to analyze the welfare effects of trade with and without a country-of-origin labeling (COOL) program. The welfare gains from trade in the absence of COOL are ambiguous, may justify the imposition of a trade ban. Even if a full ban does not improve welfare and some restriction of trade is always welfare-enhancing. Under a tariff regime, more COOL trade is better than less trade. Independently of domestic market power, free trade coupled with a COOL program maximizes national welfare.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dinopoulos, Elias ; Livanis, Grigorios ; West, Carol |
Published in: |
International Review of Economics & Finance. - Elsevier, ISSN 1059-0560. - Vol. 19.2010, 4, p. 575-589
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Country-of-origin labeling Protection Product safety Welfare Insurance markets |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Country of Origin Labeling (C.O.O.L.): How cool is it?
Dinopoulos, Elias, (2010)
-
Dinopoulos, Elias, (2005)
-
Country of origin labeling (C.O.O.L.) : how cool is it?
Dinopoulos, Elias, (2010)
- More ...