Differential Grading Standards and Student Incentives
We present data on grades from three Canadian universities. These data suggest that grading standards differ significantly across disciplines within universities. To the extent that grading standards are not uniform across disciplines, the grade point averages (GPAs) of students with different course mixes cannot be meaningfully compared, and therefore their GPAs cannot legitimately be used to assess their relative achievement. Yet GPAs are used in precisely this way--to award scholarships, honours and degrees, and to ration access to courses, academic programs, and jobs. Hence, we think differential standards raise a fundamental issue of integrity for universities. We develop a simple human capital model to assess some of the distortions arising from differential standards and suggest some non-intrusive ways to rectify the problem.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Eaton, B. Curtis ; Eswaran, Mukesh |
Published in: |
Canadian Public Policy. - University of Toronto Press. - Vol. 34.2008, 2, p. 215-236
|
Publisher: |
University of Toronto Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Asymmetric equilibria and strategic behaviour in oligopolistic markets : a synthesis
Eaton, Buford Curtis, (1984)
-
Supporting collusion by choice of inferior technologies
Eaton, Buford Curtis, (1991)
-
Supporting collusion by choice of inferior technologies
Eaton, Buford Curtis, (1991)
- More ...