Evidence on the Incentive Properties of Share Contracts
Ever since Adam Smith, share contracts have been condemned for their lack of incentives. Sharecropping tenants face incentives to undersupply productive inputs since they receive only a fraction of the marginal revenue. The empirical literature reports that lands under sharecropping are indeed less productive and employ inputs less intensively than those operated by owners. This paper shows that (1) sharecropping and fixed-rent tenancy are both associated with low-quality lands, (2) plots under sharecropping and fixed rent present (on average) the same unconditional productivity, (3) controlling for observed land quality and input use, their average productivities are also identical to those of owner-operated plots, and (4) the input choices satisfy the same profit maximization conditions for all land contracts. These results challenge the conventional wisdom connecting sharecropping to incentive distortions. They support an alternative view that farmers optimally employ more input resources into good-quality lands, which are typically managed by owners. (c) 2008 byThe University of Chicago. All rights reserved..
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Braido, Luis H. B. |
Published in: |
Journal of Law and Economics. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 51.2008, 2, p. 327-349
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Ergodic Markov equilibrium with incomplete markets and short sales
Braido, Luis H. B., (2013)
-
Testing competing explanations for the inverse productivity puzzle
Assunção, Juliano J., (2005)
-
OUTPUT CONTINGENT SECURITIES AND EFFICIENT INVESTMENT BY FIRMS
Braido, Luis H. B., (2018)
- More ...