Government Preferences and Public Forest Harvesting: A Second-Best Approach
Around the world governments own forest capital stocks and can harvest them for revenue or provide public goods from preserving them. This article examines how government preferences for revenue generation and public goods provision affect policy choices. Many instances are found where governments might exploit public forests at the expense of public goods. This is most likely when budget pressures are severe, or when the government prefers revenue generation to nontimber benefits provision. In particular, budget-constrained governments are more likely to exploit public harvests to raise revenues and subsidize the forest sector, especially when revenues are increasing in public harvesting. Public harvesting should also influence tax choice. The results shed light on current forest policy debates and can be used to predict behavior of developed and developing country governments facing external pressures. Copyright 1999, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
1999
|
---|---|
Authors: | Amacher, Gregory S. |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - Agricultural and Applied Economics Association - AAEA. - Vol. 81.1999, 1, p. 14-28
|
Publisher: |
Agricultural and Applied Economics Association - AAEA |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Intensity-Based Permit Quotas and the Business Cycle: Does Flexibility Pay Off?
Kuuselaa, Olli-Pekka, (2013)
-
Forest Rotations and Stand Interdependency: Ownership Structure and Timing of Decisions
Amacher, Gregory S., (2002)
-
Deforestation, Production Intensity and Land Use under Insecure Property Rights
Amacher, Gregory S., (2004)
- More ...