How Butter Beats the Guns?

Decreasing share of Defence in total Government expenditures reflects fundamental choices about state functions. The main hypotheses of the research is: decreasing priority of military spending could cause lower quality of Defence.The case study shows, how “punishment for military success” strategy undermines incentives for army officers. Historical data (military spending and rise of new military justice) supports main hypotheses

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2017
Authors:	Yanovskiy, Konstantin
Other Persons:	Zatcovetsky, Ilia (contributor)
Publisher:	[2017]: [S.l.] : SSRN
Subject:	Waffe \| Weapon \| Waffenrecht \| Gun law

freely available

Full text |

More access options

doi.org

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

Extent:	1 Online-Ressource (14 p)
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Language:	English
Notes:	In: Yanovskiy Moshe, Zatcovetsky Ilia "How Butter beats the Guns" Defence & Strategy, 2017 Volume 17, Number 1 (June 2017) pp.141-154 doi 10.3849/1802-7199.17.2017.01.141-154 Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments June 15, 2017 erstellt
Other identifiers:	10.2139/ssrn.2523605 [DOI]
Classification:	D72 - Economic Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Elections, Legistures, and Voting Behavior ; D74 - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances ; H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government ; H41 - Public Goods ; N40 - Government, War, Law, and Regulation. General, International, or Comparative
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012972497