Luxury and Economic Development: David Hume and Adam Smith.
David Hume thought that a taste for luxury was desirable because it promoted economic and political development (it brought down feudalism, among other things). Adam Smith's early works follow a very similar line though, unlike Hume, he saw a taste for luxury as rather contemptible despite its desirable effects. In the Wealth of Nations, however, saving is the key to growth, suggesting that spending on luxury harms growth, but Smith wanted to hang on to the arguments he had taken from Hume. This may explain a number of oddities and inconsistencies in the Wealth of Nations. Copyright 1998 by Scottish Economic Society.
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Brewer, Anthony |
Published in: |
Scottish Journal of Political Economy. - Scottish Economic Society - SES. - Vol. 45.1998, 1, p. 78-98
|
Publisher: |
Scottish Economic Society - SES |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The making of the classical theory of economic growth
Brewer, Anthony, (2010)
-
The concept of an agricultural surplus, from Petty to Smith
Brewer, Anthony A., (2008)
-
On the other (invisible) hand ...
Brewer, Anthony A., (2009)
- More ...