Medical Malpractice: An Empirical Examination of the Litigation Process
New data on medical malpractice claims against a single hospital in which a direct measure of the quality of medical care is available are used to investigate the roles of the negligence rule and incomplete information in the dispute settlement process in medical malpractice. We find that the quality of medical care (negligence) is an extremely important determinant of defendants' medical malpractice liability. More generally, we find that the data are consistent with a model in which plaintiffs are poorly informed ex ante about whether there has been negligence, file suit to gather information, and either drop the case if they find that negligence was unlikely or settle for a positive payoff if they find that negligence was likely. We also find that the cases are resolved earlier in the litigation process when the parties are more certain, one way or the other, about the likelihood of negligence.
Year of publication: |
1991
|
---|---|
Authors: | Farber, Henry S. ; White, Michelle J. |
Published in: |
RAND Journal of Economics. - The RAND Corporation, ISSN 0741-6261. - Vol. 22.1991, 2, p. 199-217
|
Publisher: |
The RAND Corporation |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
A comparison of formal and informal dispute resolution in medical malpractice
Farber, Henry S., (1993)
-
Medical malpractice : an empirical examination of the litigation process
Farber, Henry S., (1990)
-
Medical malpractice: an empirical examination of the litigation process
Farber, Henry S., (1991)
- More ...