Ownership dispersion and listing rules in companies large and small: A reply
The contrast between the findings of the present authors and Cheffins, Chambers and Koustas is explained by their addressing different sizes of firms. Chandler's view of the relative incidence of the divorce of ownership from control among large firms remains unsupported by any quantitative evidence.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hannah, Les ; Foreman-Peck, James |
Published in: |
Business History. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0007-6791. - Vol. 56.2014, 3, p. 509-516
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Extreme divorce : the managerial revolution in UK companies before 1914
Foreman-Peck, James S., (2011)
-
The diffusion and impact of the corporation in 1910
Foreman-Peck, James S., (2015)
-
Some consequences of the early twentieth-century British divorce of ownership from control
Foreman-Peck, James S., (2013)
- More ...