Paying for Quality: Current Models and Potential Impact
A decade of quality measurement and reporting suggests that poor quality is pervasive in the U.S. health care system. Neither the recognition of system wide quality problems nor public reporting of comparative quality across health plans, hospitals, and physicians has resulted in substantial changes in practice patterns. Some have argued that such change will not materialize as long as providers do not see a direct financial reward from achieving higher quality. Opponents of paying for quality argue that use of financial incentives will be demoralizing to providers or that financial incentives will be weak instruments for motivating providers to change long-standing practice patterns. Despite the lack of consensus about the potential impact of paying for quality, many U.S. health plans and employers have introduced payment incentives that target health care quality measures in the past several years. I review these efforts in the light of economic theory and evidence on both the intended and unintended consequences of using financial incentives to improve performance.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Rosenthal, Meredith |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
State and federal approaches to health reform : what works for the working poor?
Meara, Ellen, (2008)
-
A report card on the freshman class of consumer-directed health plans
Rosenthal, Meredith, (2005)
-
Alidina, Shehnaz, (2016)
- More ...