Regulation and the Evolution of Corporate Boards: Monitoring, Advising, or Window Dressing?
It is generally agreed that boards are endogenously determined institutions that serve both oversight and advisory roles in a firm. While the oversight role of boards has been extensively studied, relatively few studies have examined the advisory role of corporate boards. We examine the participation of political directors on the boards of natural gas companies between 1930 and 1998. We focus on the expansion of federal regulation of the natural gas industry in 1938 and 1954 and subsequent partial deregulation in 1986. Using data sets covering the periods from 1930 to 1990 and 1978 to 1998, we test whether regulation and deregulation altered the composition of companies' boards as the firms' environment changed. In particular, did regulation cause an increase and deregulation a decrease in the number of political directors on corporate boards? We find evidence that the number of political directors increases as firms shift from market to political competition. Specifically, the regulation of natural gas is associated with an increase in the number of political directors and deregulation is associated with a decrease in the number of political directors on boards.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Helland, Eric ; Sykuta, Michael |
Published in: |
Journal of Law and Economics. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 47.2004, 1, p. 167-93
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Regulation and the evolution of corporate boards: monitoring, advising or window dressing?
Helland, Eric, (2002)
-
Regulation and the evolution of corporate boards : Monitoring, advising, or window dressing?
Helland, Eric, (2004)
-
Who's monitoring the monitor? : Do outside directors protect shareholders' interests?
Helland, Eric, (2005)
- More ...