Response to De Vroey
This paper is a response to Michel De Vroey's review of our book, published in this issue of EJHET. Differently from De Vroey's, our aim is to understand the theoretical choices with which economists believed they were confronted at the time. This is reflected in the organisation of our book, the selection of topics (disequilibrium, imperfect competition, etc.), and the conclusions about the fate of disequilibrium macroeconomics.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Backhouse, Roger E. ; Boianovsky, Mauro |
Published in: |
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0967-2567. - Vol. 21.2014, 4, p. 743-749
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Theories of stagnation in historical perspective
Backhouse, Roger E., (2016)
-
Transforming modern macroeconomics : exploring disequilibrium microfoundations, 1956-2003
Backhouse, Roger, (2013)
-
Backhouse, Roger, (2014)
- More ...