Some Implications of Imperfect Competition for Recent Trade Theory.
This paper argues that in a general-equilibrium context, it is not sensible for oligopolistic (and monopolistically competitive) firms to maximize profit, because the outcome would be sensitive to the choice of the numeraire. The natural objective of these firms would be to maximize the utility of the shareholders if the shareholders are identical. I show that even if each firm takes the representative individual's marginal utility of income as given, the outcome of the utility maximization objective is Pareto optimal, and in equilibrium, each firm equates price with marginal cost. Copyright 1995 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year of publication: |
1995
|
---|---|
Authors: | Shimomura, Koji |
Published in: |
Review of International Economics. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 0965-7576. - Vol. 3.1995, 2, p. 244-47
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Long, Ngo Van, (2009)
-
Can a preferential trade agreement benefit neighbor countries without compensating them?
Endoh, Masahiro, (2008)
-
Increasing returns and international trade: A new approach
Kemp, Murray C., (1997)
- More ...