Strategic incompatibility in ATM markets
We test whether firms use incompatibility strategically, using data from ATM markets. High ATM fees degrade the value of competitors’ deposit accounts, and can in principle serve as a mechanism for siphoning depositors away from competitors or for creating deposit account differentiation. Our empirical framework can empirically distinguish surcharging motivated by this strategic concern from surcharging that simply maximizes ATM profit considered as a standalone operation. The results are consistent with such behavior by large banks, but not by small banks. For large banks, the effect of incompatibility seems to operate through higher deposit account fees rather than increased deposit account base.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Knittel, Christopher R. ; Stango, Victor |
Publisher: |
Davis, CA : University of California, Department of Economics |
Saved in:
freely available
Series: | Working Paper ; 06-29 |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | 571794041 [GVK] hdl:10419/31398 [Handle] |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010274476
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Incompatibility, Product Attributes and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from ATMs
Knittel, Christopher R., (2004)
-
Incompatibility, product attributes and consumer welfare: evidence from ATMs
Knittel, Christopher R., (2005)
-
Compatibility and pricing with indirect network effects: evidence from ATMs
Knittel, Christopher R., (2005)
- More ...