Strike incidence and strike duration: Some new evidence from Ontario
The authors use a unique longitudinal data set from Ontario, covering the years 1984-92, to estimate the determinants of strike incidence and duration. Unlike most empirical analyses of strikes, the data set for this study contains both small and large bargaining units. The authors find strong evidence that the likelihood of a future strike was lower among bargaining units that had struck before than among those that had not (the "teetotaler" effect); the longer a strike lasted, the greater was the probability of settling (positive duration dependence); and smaller bargaining units were less likely to strike than were larger bargaining units, but had longer strikes when they did strike. (Free full-text download available at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/.)
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Campolieti, Michele ; Hebdon, Robert ; Hyatt, Douglas |
Published in: |
Industrial and Labor Relations Review. - School of Industrial & Labor Relations, ISSN 0019-7939. - Vol. 58.2005, 4, p. 610-630
|
Publisher: |
School of Industrial & Labor Relations |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Strike incidence and strike duration : some new evidence from Ontario
Campolieti, Michele, (2005)
-
Strike Incidence and Strike Duration: Some New Evidence from Ontario
Campolieti, Michele, (2005)
-
Strike Incidence and Strike Duration: Some New Evidence from Ontario
Campolieti, Michele, (2005)
- More ...