Targeting Revisited.
Public spending programs aimed at alleviating poverty can either be broadly targeted at categories of spending or narrowly targeted at types of people. Each approach has benefits and costs to the poor. It is often claimed that narrow targeting of the poor will allow governments to reduce poverty more effectively and at lower cost. But narrow targeting often has hidden costs, and once these costs are considered, the most finely targeted policy may not have any more effect on poverty than a broadly targeted one. Both approaches also have hidden benefits, although less is known about their impact. Targeting can help, but it is not a cure-all. Reducing poverty calls for broadly targeted social sector spending combined with narrower targeting of cash and in-kind transfers to specific groups. It is also important for governments to experiment with schemes that offer better incentives, to carefully monitor the costs and outcomes, and to be flexible and pragmatic in their policy responses. Copyright 1998 by Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | van de Walle, Dominique |
Published in: |
World Bank Research Observer. - World Bank Group. - Vol. 13.1998, 2, p. 231-48
|
Publisher: |
World Bank Group |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Fungibility And The Flypaper Effect of Project Aid : Micro-Evidence For Vietnam
van de Walle, Dominique, (2007)
-
Do Services and Transfers Reach Morocco's Poor? : Evidence from Poverty and Spending Maps
van de Walle, Dominique, (2005)
-
Lasting Welfare Effects of Widowhood in a Poor Country
Van de Walle, Dominique, (2011)
- More ...