The Broadband Stimulus: A Rural Boondoggle and Missed Opportunity
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included $7 billion for broadband development. We highlight two endemic problems with the rural subsidy programs managed by NTIA: 1) There is little economic rationale for subsidizing rural areas; and 2) NTIA’s mechanism for selecting projects appears to have been largely incoherent. The rationale for rural subsidies has been debunked by scores of economists – the programs turn out to be inefficient income transfer mechanisms and do not tend to increase subscriptions, but Congress forced NTIA to award subsidies. In its awards, NTIA adopted a system that led to awards differing by more than a factor of 100 in terms of expected cost-effectiveness. Had it adopted a more reasonable framework, many more households could have been connected for the same money, or the same number of connections could have been realized for a fraction of the cost.
Year of publication: |
2013-11
|
---|---|
Authors: | Rosston, Gregory ; Wallsten, Scott |
Institutions: | Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Using Spectrum Auctions to Enhance Competition in Wireless Services
Cramton, Peter, (2011)
-
Articulating A Modern Approach to FCC Competition Policy
Hundt, Reed, (2013)
-
Low-Income Demand for Local Telephone Service: Effects of Lifeline and Linkup
Ackerberg, Daniel, (2008)
- More ...