The economics of wild goose chases
type="main"> <p>Empirical evidence consistently finds that incentive pay is more frequent when authority is delegated to workers than when their superiors hold authority. We provide a model where incentive pay results in the abuse of authority by their superiors, and (under reasonable conditions) implies that (i) incentive pay is higher when an agent holds control rights than when her principal has authority, (ii) effort is less responsive on the margin to incentive pay when the principal holds authority, and (iii) more incentive pay can reduce effort under authority, even on tasks that can be easily measured.
Year of publication: |
2015
|
---|---|
Authors: | Prendergast, Canice |
Published in: |
RAND Journal of Economics. - RAND, ISSN 0741-6261. - Vol. 46.2015, 1, p. 146-164
|
Publisher: |
RAND |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
"Drive and Wave": The Response to LAPD Police Reforms After Rampart
Prendergast, Canice, (2021)
-
Barter, Liquidity and Market Segmentation
Prendergast, Canice, (2001)
-
Theories of internal labor markets
Prendergast, Canice, (1989)
- More ...