The ‘user’ in research funding negotiation processes
National research priorities are often the outcome of negotiations between multiple research stakeholders. These stakeholders include groups of research ‘users’, which means that the negotiation processes are no longer controlled by ‘science’. In this paper, we explore the use of the ideographic term ‘users’ in the discourse surrounding the negotiation processes between a New Zealand funding agency, a research institute and an industry body. The case study highlights the implications of translating the ideographic user collective, as it appears in policy, into an individual representative to participate in a negotiation process. The design of negotiation processes should, therefore, recognize that ‘ideal’ user representation may be an unobtainable goal. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Davenport, Sally ; Leitch, Shirley ; Rip, Arie |
Published in: |
Science and Public Policy. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0302-3427. - Vol. 30.2003, 4, p. 239-250
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The role of boundary organizations in maintaining separation in the triple helix
Davenport, Sally, (2010)
-
Circuits of power in practice : strategic ambiguity as delegation of authority
Davenport, Sally, (2010)
-
What makes a stakeholder act? : exploring the impact of the issue in the stakeholder relationship
Davenport, Sally, (2012)
- More ...