climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighing are inappropriate from a national decision maker's point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …

climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighing are inappropriate from a national decision maker's point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …

climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighing are inappropriate from a national decision maker’s point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …

climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighing are inappropriate from a national decision maker's point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …

climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighing are inappropriate from a national decision maker’s point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …

climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighing are inappropriate from a national decision maker's point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …

climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions. Implicitly or explicitly, such estimates … to equity weighting are inappropriate from a national decision maker's point of view, because domestic impacts are not … assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice. We show that previous approaches …