Showing 1 - 10 of 37
The launch of a public project requires support from "enough" members of a group. Members (players) are differently important for the project and have different cost/benefit relations. There are players who profit and players who suffer from the launch of the project. Examples are the Kyoto...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010251206
In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games players contribute or not to the production of a public good which is produced if and only if there are "enough" contributors. There is a plethora of equilibria in BTPG games. We experimentally test general theoretical attributes of equilibria and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011434498
Theories about unique equilibrium selection are often rejected in experimental investigations. We drop the idea of selecting a single prominent equilibrium but suggest the coexistence of different beliefs about "appropriate" equilibrium or non-equilibrium play. Our main selection criterion is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011629780
In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games n players contribute or not to the production of a public good which is produced if and only if there are at least k contributors. The BTPG games with the highest (k=n) and the lowest (k=1) threshold are the Stag Hunt game and the Volunteer's Dilemma....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011629786
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011349898
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012617303
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012008438
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011777686
A solidarity game was conducted where participants were able to choose between two lotteries with same expected values. However, in one lottery, the risky one, participants faced a higher probability to receive no endowment. The winners were then able to discriminate between subjects risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003889454
A solidarity game was conducted where participants were able to choose between two lotteries with same expected values. However, in one lottery, the risky one, participants faced a higher probability to receive no endowment. The winners were then able to discriminate between subjects risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905848