Narrow search
Showing 1 - 10 of 149
Cover Image
The strategy method risks conflating confusion with a social preference for conditional cooperation in public goods games
Burton-Chellew, Maxwell N.; D'Amico, Victoire; Guérin, … - In: Games 13 (2022) 6, pp. 1-10
The strategy method is often used in public goods games to measure an individual's willingness to cooperate depending on the level of cooperation by their groupmates (conditional cooperation). However, while the strategy method is informative, it risks conflating confusion with a desire for fair...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014418083
Cover Image
Explaining cooperative behavior in public goods games : how preferences and beliefs affect contribution levels
Ackermann, Kurt A.; Murphy, Ryan O. - In: Games 10 (2019) 1/15, pp. 1-34
individual level using multiple methods, and at multiple times during the experiment. With this rich set of predictor variables …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012015524
Cover Image
Do economists punish less?
Kaiser, Jonas Pilgaard; Pedersen, Kasper Selmar; Koch, … - In: Games 9 (2018) 4/75, pp. 1-17
whether to engage in costly punishment of a free rider in a survey-based experiment with 1423 students from seven study areas …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011905088
Cover Image
Introduction to the special issue "pro-sociality and cooperation"
Ghidoni, Riccardo - In: Games 12 (2021) 3, pp. 1-2
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012649172
Cover Image
Motivational crowding out effects in charitable giving : experimental evidence
Müller, Stephan; Rau, Holger A. - 2018
This paper tests motivational crowding out in the domain of charitable giving. A novelty is that our experiment …, preference elicitation allows us to focus on the reaction of donors characterized by different degrees of intrinsic motivation … intrinsic motivation, who received a reimbursement, reduce their donations more than four times as much as equally motivated …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011796772
Cover Image
Giving to versus taking from in- and out-group members
Alt, Marius; Gallier, Carlo; Schlüter, Achim; Nelson, … - In: Games 9 (2018) 3/57, pp. 1-14
In this experiment, we test whether subjects’ responses to variations in the action set in a dictator game depends on …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011891039
Cover Image
Punishment strategies across societies : conventional wisdoms reconsidered
Suleiman, Ramzi; Samid, Yuval - In: Games 12 (2021) 3, pp. 1-23
reconsiders the generality of both explanations. Using data from a public goods experiment with punishment, conducted by the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012607461
Cover Image
Intentions-based reciprocity to monetary and non-monetary gifts
Chao, Matthew - In: Games 9 (2018) 4/74, pp. 1-18
Social preference models emphasize that perceived intentions motivate reciprocity. However, laboratory tests of this theory typically manipulate perceived intentions through changes in wealth resulting from a sacrifice in pay by another. There is little evidence on whether reciprocity occurs in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011905085
Cover Image
Homophily and social norms in experimental network formation games
Arifovic, Jasmina; Danese, Giuseppe - In: Games 9 (2018) 4/83, pp. 1-22
both homophily and social norms in a controlled environment. At the beginning of our experiment, each player fills in a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011993333
Cover Image
Hybrid assessment scheme based on the stern-judging rule for maintaining cooperation under indirect reciprocity
Okada, Isamu; Yamamoto, Hitoshi; Uchida, Satoshi - In: Games 11 (2020) 1/13, pp. 1-10
Intensive studies on indirect reciprocity have explored rational assessment rules for maintaining cooperation and several have demonstrated the effects of the stern-judging rule. Uchida and Sasaki demonstrated that the stern-judging rule is not suitable for maintaining cooperative regimes in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012167923