Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013435956
In questions inserted into the 2008 module of the German-Socio Economic Panel we ask subjects to report their income relative to different reference groups, such as fellow employees, other people in their profession, same age and same gender groups, friends, and neighbours. In addition subjects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003868522
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001552886
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013436064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013436080
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013436194
To the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze the impact of faked interviews on survey results are based on ?artificial fakes? generated by project students in a ?laboratory environment?. In contrast, panel data provide a unique opportunity to identify data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261661
A particular shortcoming of panel surveys is potential bias arising from selective attrition. Based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) we analyze potential artifacts (level, structure, inequality of income) by comparing results from two independently drawn panel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261814
Typically, laboratory experiments suffer from homogeneous subject pools and self-selection biases. The usefulness of survey data is limited by measurement error and by the questionability of their behavioral relevance. Here we present a method integrating interactive experiments and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262013