Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013435956
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001552886
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013436064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013436080
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013436194
To the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze the impact of faked interviews on survey results are based on ?artificial fakes? generated by project students in a ?laboratory environment?. In contrast, panel data provide a unique opportunity to identify data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261661
A particular shortcoming of panel surveys is potential bias arising from selective attrition. Based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) we analyze potential artifacts (level, structure, inequality of income) by comparing results from two independently drawn panel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261814
Typically, laboratory experiments suffer from homogeneous subject pools and self-selection biases. The usefulness of survey data is limited by measurement error and by the questionability of their behavioral relevance. Here we present a method integrating interactive experiments and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262013
Are immigrants on welfare because they are more likely to be eligible or because they are more likely to claim benefits for which they are eligible? The answer is politically important, but because most current research on immigration and welfare is based on data from the U.S., the answer is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262289