Showing 1 - 7 of 7
In this paper we examine whether absorptive capacity can constitute sufficient justification for rejecting the proposal of a large aid increase to support the ‘big push’. We argue that the probability of a poverty trap exists for many countries, in particular the least developed countries...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010323520
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003412456
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003664155
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002126604
In this paper they argue that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. Debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than either loans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008739767
We argue in this paper that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. Debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than either loans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005031760
This paper looks at the ?grants versus loans?? controversy. It questions the claim sometimes made that development institutions should refrain from making loans and should instead distribute ODA as outright grants only. It discusses various reasons why developing countries do not have full...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005560032