Showing 1 - 10 of 69
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003716058
"Like the rest of the poor periphery, Mexico had to deal with de-industrialization forces between 1750 and 1913, those critical 150 years when the economic gap between the industrial core and the primary-product-producing periphery widened to such huge dimensions. Yet, from independence to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003338546
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003810405
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003871597
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003458868
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003996411
"W. Arthur Lewis argued that a new international economic order emerged between 1870 and 1913, and that global terms of trade forces produced rising primary product specialization and de-industrialization in the poor periphery. More recently, modern economists argue that volatility reduces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003676239
Two of the main forces driving European emigration in the late nineteenth century were real wage gaps between sending and receiving regions and demographic booms in the low-wage sending regions (directly augmenting the supply of potential movers as well as indirectly making already-measured...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011391489
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010516844
Except for the Philippines between 1896 and 1939, Southeast Asia was never part of the century-long East Asian industrial catching up until after World War II. Before the 1950s, Southeast Asian manufacturing hardly grew at all: while commodity export processing did grow fast, import-competing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010530526