Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Does self-serving elite behaviour make citizens more politically active? This paper presents the results of a randomized field experiment where voters in Tanzania were given information about elite use of tax havens. Information provided in a neutral form had no effect on voting intentions....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011943818
A number of studies document an in-group bias in social dilemma situations. While group structure and dynamics are important in shaping in-group favouritism, less attention has been paid to individual characteristics affecting favouritism. Using data from dictator games conducted among 523...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010319851
A number of studies document an in-group bias in social dilemma situations. While group structure and dynamics are important in shaping in-group favouritism, less attention has been paid to individual characteristics affecting favouritism. Using data from dictator games conducted among 523...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009537239
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001733523
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012585725
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012586162
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012586238
Does self-serving elite behaviour make citizens more politically active? This paper presents the results of a randomized field experiment where voters in Tanzania were given information about elite use of tax havens. Information provided in a neutral form had no effect on voting intentions....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011789029
A number of studies document an in-group bias in social dilemma situations. While group structure and dynamics are important in shaping in-group favouritism, less attention has been paid to individual characteristics affecting favouritism. Using data from
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010854531
The effect of government decentralization on corruption is theoretically ambiguous. On the one hand, bringing government closer to the people could increase accountability and reduce corruption. On the other hand, decentralization could increase local capture and uncoordinated bribe taking...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010950532