Showing 1 - 10 of 959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003640983
"The probability of selection into treatment plays an important role in matching and selection models. However, this probability can often not be consistently estimated, because of choice-based sampling designs with unknown sampling weights. This note establishes that the selection and matching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003866844
The internal rate of return to schooling is a fundamental economic parameter that is often used to assess whether expenditure on education should be increased or decreased. This paper considers alternative approaches to estimating marginal internal rates of return for different schooling levels....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003870352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003083968
Numerous studies regress log earnings on schooling and report estimated coefficients as "Mincer rates of return". A more recent literature uses instrumental variables. This chapter considers the economic interpretation of these analyses and how the availability of repeated cross section and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003039646
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001760429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001765849
The probability of selection into treatment plays an important role in matching and selection models. However, this probability can often not be consistently estimated, because of choice-based sampling designs with unknown sampling weights. This note establishes that the selection and matching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012463470
The internal rate of return to schooling is a fundamental economic parameter that is often used to assess whether expenditure on education should be increased or decreased. This paper considers alternative approaches to estimating marginal internal rates of return for different schooling levels....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012464867
This paper considers the interpretation of "Mincer rates of return." We test and reject the Mincer model. It fails to track the time series of true returns. We show how repeated cross section and panel data improves the ability of analysts to estimate the ex ante and ex post marginal rate of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012467134