Showing 1 - 10 of 99
Demands and concessions in a multi-stage bargaining process are shaped by the probabilities that each side will prevail in an impasse. Standard game-theoretic predictions are quite sharp: demands are pushed to the precipice with nothing left on the table, but there is no conflict regardless of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369367
Demands and concessions in a multi-stage bargaining process are shaped by the probabilities that each side will prevail in an impasse. Standard game-theoretic predictions are quite sharp: demands are pushed to the precipice with nothing left on the table, but there is no conflict regardless of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010684604
We provide the first experimental results on a two-stage model of militarized conflict based on the ubiquitous ultimatum bargaining game that dominates much of the theoretical analysis of international relations. We illustrate how data from experimental trials deviate from the equilibrium...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013140566
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008650233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003943967
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003943989
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003944057
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003944065
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010381482
In a model of simultaneous voting, Feddersen and Pesendorfer (1998) consider the possibility that jurors vote strategically, rather than sincerely reflecting their individual information. This results in the counterintuitive result that a jury is more likely to convict the innocent under a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013172468