Showing 1 - 10 of 26
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012895314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011539085
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011564025
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011386941
The authors use leximetric analysis, which involves the numerical coding of the strength of legal protections, to document changes in the level of investor (shareholder and creditor) protection and worker protection in Australia for the period 1970-2010. For worker protection, the level of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013099238
Non-executive employees are increasingly being offered the opportunity to participate in employee share ownership plans. In many cases, companies provide their employees with shares or options as a 'gift', either on a one-off or regular basis. Many plans, however, are structured so as to require...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724617
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012726098
Employee share ownership (ESO) has been the subject of significant public policy debate. In these debates, ESO plans are usually said to be implemented for a variety of reasons including alignment of employer and employee interests, increased employee productivity, improved workplace harmony,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012733248
Employee share ownership (quot;ESOquot;) schemes have recently been the subject of public policy interest in Australia. Employees owning shares in the company for which they work potentially has a number of ramifications, not least of which is the prospect that these schemes might circumvent the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012735119
Various explanations have been advanced for why shareholder protection looks the way that it does. These explanations include varieties of capitalism, legal origins and various configurations of social interests. When compared with the United States and the United Kingdom, Australian corporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013005990