Showing 1 - 10 of 158
We present a simple framework to illustrate the welfare consequences of a “top up” health insurance policy that allows patients to pay the incremental price for more expensive treatment options. We contrast it with common alternative policies that require essentially no incremental payments...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010878070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011849008
We report results from a validation study of Nielsen Homescan data. We use data from a large grocery chain to match thousands of individual transactions that were recorded by both the retailer (at the store) and the Nielsen Homescan panelist (at home). First, we report how often shopping trips...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270304
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270312
We provide a graphical illustration of how standard consumer and producer theory can be used to quantify the welfare loss associated with inefficient pricing in insurance markets with selection. We then show how this welfare loss can be estimated empirically using identifying variation in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009479995
Much of the extensive empirical literature on insurance markets hasfocused on whether adverse selection can be detected. Once detected, however, therehas been little attempt to quantify its welfare cost, or to assess whether and whatpotential government interventions may reduce these costs. To...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009479996
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010287537
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003742957
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003770588
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003773004