Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014322226
The evolutionary explanation of human dispositions to prosocial behaviour and to moralization of such behaviour undermines the moral realist's belief in objective moral facts that hold independently of people's contingent desires. At the same time, advocacy of preferences for significant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266703
The paper critically reviews the impact of models of cognitive architecture on economics. A historical survey is provided that indicates the reasons for most economists' non-participation, as either producers or consumers, in the cognitive revolution. The remainder of the paper shows, partly by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013117374
The paper replies to Wade Hands's recent criticism of one part of my 2005 book, Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation (ETCS). Hands argues that my association of my view of the foundations of microeconomics with aspects of the thought of Lionel Robbins and Paul Samuelson is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724181
The evolutionary explanation of human dispositions to prosocial behaviour and to moralization of such behaviour undermines the moral realist's belief in objective moral facts that hold independently of people's contingent desires. At the same time, advocacy of preferences for radical large-scale...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012730927
This paper critically reviews the first decade of neuroeconomic research from a methodological perspective. It examines details of specific examples of neuroeconomic hypothesis construction and testing in order to illustrate and substantiate a critical perspective articulated in previous work...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014194379
The paper reviews the basis for claims by anti-economists, over history and from both conservative and radical perspectives, that economics cannot be fully purged of ideological elements and to that extent cannot be scientific. The paper first distinguishes five versions of this thesis, and then...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014194812
The paper reviews the standard concept of the economic agent as featured in contemporary microeconomics, showing why the practice of economists does not equate this agent to a person, and why economists’ longstanding interests in ‘individualism’ and ‘microfoundations’ should not be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014194813
That the rationality of individual people is ‘bounded’ – that is, finite in scope and representational reach, and constrained by the opportunity cost of time – cannot reasonably be controversial as an empirical matter. In this context, the paper addresses the question as to why, if...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014150388
We critically review the methodological practices of two research programs which are jointly called 'neuroeconomics'. We defend the first of these, termed 'neurocellular economics' (NE) by Ross (2008), from an attack on its relevance by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008) (GP). This attack arbitrarily...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008525382