Showing 1 - 10 of 86
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012547284
This paper shows that in some axioms regarding the mixture of random variables, the requirement that the conclusions hold for all values of the mixture parameter can be weakened by requiring the existence of only one nontrivial value of the parameter, which need not be fixed. This is the case...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014245367
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014319893
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012489521
Ambiguity-aversion is a person's rational attitude towards the indeterminacy of the probability that attaches to his future prospects, both favorable and unfavorable. An ambiguity-averse person increases the probability of the unfavorable prospect, which is what criminal defendants typically do...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012783600
Machina (2009, 2012) lists a number of situations where standard models of ambiguity aversion are unable to capture plausible features of ambiguity attitudes. Most of these problems arise in choice over prospects involving three or more outcomes. We show that the recursive non-expected utility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013106219
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013206069
We study a simple variant of the house allocation problem (one-sided matching). We demonstrate that agents with recursive preferences may systematically prefer one allocation mechanism to the other, even among mechanisms that are considered to be the same in standard models, in the sense that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241412
Experimental evidence suggests that individuals who face an asymmetric distribution over the likelihood of a specific event might actually prefer not to know the exact value of this probability. We address these findings by studying a decision maker who has recursive, non-expected utility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014151382
Two similarly situated individuals commit identical crimes. The first is sentenced to 10 years in prison while the second is sentenced to 5 years. The disparity between the two sentences of the criminals is a reason for concern. The person who is sentenced to 10 years has a legitimate moral...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207164