Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009545825
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012223982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011741994
Predictions under common knowledge of payoffs may differ from those under arbitrarily, but finitely, many orders of mutual knowledge; Rubinstein's (1989) Email game is a seminal example. Weinstein and Yildiz (2007) showed that the discontinuity in the example generalizes: for all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012637367
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011485708
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011833215
We show that in any game that is continuous at infinity, if a plan of action a<sub>i</sub> is played by a type t<sub>i</sub> in a Bayesian Nash equilibrium, then there are perturbations of t<sub>i</sub> for which a<sub>i</sub> is the only rationalizable plan and whose unique rationalizable belief regarding the play of the game is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010970153
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408890
We analyze "nice" games (where action spaces are compact intervals, utilities continuous and strictly concave in own action), which are used frequently in classical economic models. Without making any "richness" assumption, we characterize the sensitivity of any given Bayesian Nash equilibrium...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008914615
I further pursue the proposal of Mankiw to consider fairness or “Just Deserts” as the main guide to tax policy. I suggest very different policy conclusions. In particular, I point out some key assumptions that were left implicit in Mankiw's analysis, and question whether these hold in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009188357