Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009613531
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011566692
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014427762
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012415638
The quest for benefit from existing wealth or by seeking privileged benefit through influence over policy is known as rent seeking. Much rent seeking activity involves government and political decisions and is therefore in the domain of political economy, although it can also take place in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011198776
The authors consider a two-period game of conflict between two factions, which have a desire for revenge. It is shown that, in contrast to conventional wisdom, the desire for revenge need not lead to escalation of the conflict. The subgame-perfect equilibrium is characterized by two effects: a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011136288
The authors study the incentive effects of rematches in sports with an emphasis on professional boxing. If the difference between the boxers’ abilities is sufficiently small, the authors find that a clause that stipulates that the winner of the fight is obliged to give the loser a rematch...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011139183
The author makes a pedagogical contribution to optimal income taxation. Using a very simple model adapted from George A. Akerlof (1978), he demonstrates a key result in the approach to public economics and welfare economics pioneered by Nobel laureate James Mirrlees. He shows how incomplete...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010622902
We consider a two-stage contest in which players choose destructive efforts (sabotage) in stage 1 and productive efforts in stage 2. When the value of the prize is sufficiently high, we find that the productive effort of the contestants is independent of the value but their destructive effort is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010588390
I study a two-period model of conflict with two combatants and a third party who is an ally of one of the combatants. The third party is fully informed about the type of her ally but not about the type of her ally's enemy. In a signaling game, I find that if the third party is unable to give a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010971686