Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009548756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009488735
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009948269
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011699784
In this paper, we show that there are important differences across patent examiners at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We show that more experienced examiners cite less prior art, are more likely to grant patents, and are more likely to grant patents without any rejections. These results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011009918
How can we allow patent examiners to effectively distinguish between patentable and unpatentable inventions, without slowing the process to a crawl or wasting a bunch of money? This essay reviews the recent literature and considers a number of proposals and their limitations. It concludes that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011271384
Executive SummaryHow can we allow patent examiners to effectively distinguish between patentable and unpatentable inventions without slowing the process to a crawl or wasting a bunch of money? This essay reviews the recent literature and considers a number of proposals and their limitations. It...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010636659
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010822098
Patent law both imposes a duty on patent applicants to submit relevant prior art to the PTO and assumes that examiners use this information to determine an application's patentability. In this paper, we examine the validity of these assumptions by studying the use made of applicant-submitted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011046526
Economists often assume that a patent gives its owner a well-defined legal right to exclude others from practicing the invention described in the patent. In practice, however, the rights afforded to patent holders are highly uncertain. Under patent law, a patent is no guarantee of exclusion but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005563084