Showing 1 - 10 of 36
We study a complete information preemption game in continuous time. A finite number of firms decide when to make an irreversible, observable investment. Upon investment, a firm receives flow profits, which decrease in the number of firms that have invested. The cost of investment declines over...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010796113
We show that in a preemption game of entry into a Cournot market, increasing the number of competitors beyond duopoly does not bring forward the time of first entry. We also show that all entries, except the first one, occur earlier than socially optimal.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010681752
In a preemption game, players decide when to take an irreversible action. Delaying the action exogenously increases payoffs, but there is an early mover advantage. Riordan (1992) shows that in a preemption game with two asymmetric players, players act in decreasing order of efficiency. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011065418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011572318
We argue that a precedent is important not only because it changes the relative frequency of a certain event, making it positive rather than zero, but also because it changes the way that relative frequencies are weighed. Specifically, agents assess probabilities of future events based on past...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011951837
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012034538
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011847293
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012195097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014340849
Coordination games often have multiple equilibria. The selection of equilibrium raises the question of belief formation: how do players generate beliefs about the behavior of other players? This article takes the view that the answer lies in history, that is, in the outcomes of similar...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010865832