Showing 1 - 5 of 5
We present a lab-field experiment designed to assess systematically the external validity of social preferences elicited in a variety of experimental games. We do this by comparing behavior in the different games with a number of behaviors elicited in the field and with self-reported behaviors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011115551
sequentially rationalizable. Finally, we show that some prominent voting mechanisms are also sequentially rationalizable. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011253113
What determines risk attraction or aversion? We experimentally examine three factors: the gain-loss dichotomy, the probabilities (0.2 vs. 0.8), and the money at risk (7 amounts). We find that, for both gains and losses and for low and high probabilities, the majority display risk attraction for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010547141
Are poor people more or less likely to take money risks than wealthy folks? We find that risk attraction is more prevalent among the wealthy when the amounts of money at risk are small (not surprising, since ten dollars is a smaller amount for a wealthy person than for a poor one), but,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010547142
Equivalence classes of normal form games are defined using the discontinuities of correspondences of standard equilibrium concepts like correlated, Nash, and robust equilibrium, or risk dominance and rationalizability. Resulting equivalence classes are fully characterized and compared across...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010547401