Showing 1 - 8 of 8
successors to the Kyoto protocol are assessed according to four criteria: economic efficiency; environmental effectiveness …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005124346
The literature on international environmental agreements has recognized the role transfers play in encouraging participation in international environmental agreements (IEAs), but the few results achieved so far are overly specific and do not exploit the full potential of transfers for successful...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005124446
Most analyses of the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms focus on the cost effectiveness of "where" flexibility (e.g. by …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005114381
highlights an unambiguous weakness of the Kyoto Protocol, where the aforementioned countries either have no binding emission … targets or have decided not to comply with their targets. Therefore, when discussing possible post-Kyoto scenarios, it is …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005114398
This paper analyses the cost implications for climate policy in developed countries if developing countries are unwilling to adopt measures to reduce their own GHG emissions. First, we assume that a 450 CO2 (550 CO2e) ppmv stabilisation target is to be achieved and that Non Annex1 (NA1)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005666677
This paper is the concluding chapter of Rights, Rents and Fairness: Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme, edited by the co-authors and forthcoming from Cambridge University Press. The main objective of this paper is to distill the lessons and general principles to be learnt from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005667060
Despite the growing concern about actual on-going climate change, there is little consensus about the scale and timing of actions needed to stabilise the concentrations of greenhouse gases. Many countries are unwilling to implement effective mitigation strategies, at least in the short-term, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005661739
This Paper analyses whether different emission trading regimes provide different incentives to participate in a cooperative climate agreement. Different incentive structures are discussed for those countries, namely the US, Russia and China, that are most important in the climate negotiation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005661962