Showing 1 - 10 of 45
The paper reports the results of 39 laboratory duopoly markets for which pricing institution and participant experience are treatments. Cournot (C) duopolies (quantity precommitment and a price determined to clear the market) are contrasted with Kreps-Scheinkman (KS) duopolies (quantity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005245043
Prior experimental studies provide evidence that the levels of trust and reciprocity are highly susceptible to individuals’ preferences towards payoffs, prior experience, capacity to learn more about personal characteristics of each other and social distance. The objective of this study is to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005245044
In an experiment, we studied how small groups tackle a company takeover game, a task where participants deciding in isolation frequently exhibit the winner’s curse. We found that groups of three members, who could exchange opinions and chat, substantially reduced the winner's curse and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010614157
Schott et al. (2007) have shown that the “tragedy of the commons” can be overcome when individuals share their output equally in groups of optimal size and there is no communication. The assignment of individuals to groups as either strangers or partners does not significantly affect this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008625834
We replicate and extend an experiment due to Walker and Gardner by investigating the effect of communication in a common pool resource subject to probabilistic destruction when group appropriation exceeds a safe zone. We replicate the Gardner and Walker result that destruction of the resource is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005763338
The ability of four contracts within the general class of exogenous targeting instruments, proposed by Segerson (1988), to induce socially optimal outcomes in a group moral hazard environment is investigated in an experiment based on Nalbantian and Schotter (1987). Both contracts based on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005763359
Economists often work with microdata taken from surveys using complex sampling designs. Each redord includes a weight variable represnting the reciprocal of its probability of getting into the sample. When should these weights be used? If they be used, what is the best way to use them? In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005763367
Data from three non-linear public goods experiments provide evidence that the random reassignment of participants to groups during a session does not have a significant effect on voluntary contributions as compared with voluntary contributions made by participants in groups whose members do not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005763368
This paper reports an experiment that examines whether groups can make better decisions than individuals in contests. Our experiment replicates previous findings that individual players significantly overbid relative to theoretical predictions, incurring substantial losses. There is high...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008528454
This paper examines whether and how communication can help groups solve coordination and free-rider problems when they compete with another group for a public-good prize. We find that when group members make an anonymous individual decision on whether or not to contribute to the group success,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008528456