Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Recent research shows that journal reviewing practices are neither objective nor fair. I propose a procedure to increase the likelihood of publishing important papers. This will be tested by Interfaces for a year.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005556509
Intentional Changes is an important book. It suggests different approaches to the way in which we try to implement change. It provides, as do most important books, much that you will disagree with. Tough’s conclusions are based on studies that are likely to be unknown to you. The book is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408084
As Cicchetti indicates, agreement among reviewers is not high. This conclusion is empirically supported by Fiske and Fogg (1990), who reported that two independent reviews of the same papers typically had no critical point in common. Does this imply that journal editors should strive for a high...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408086
Rosenstone develops a causal model to forecast political voting. The model seems reasonable; for example, it includes information about party, key issues, the economy, war, incumbency, region, and trends over time. Standard econometric methods are then used to determine how much weight should be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005062661
scale surveys. We offer a framework for discussing forecasts in the area of marketing, and then review the literature in …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005119356
. This review gives a description of the content of Dillman’s book. It goes on to describe the flaws not only to alert the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005119369
Q. What do you have when you have a lawyer up to his neck in sand? A. Not enough sand.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005119418