Showing 1 - 10 of 39
Admati and Perry (1987) derive the equilibrium in a bargaining game between a seller and buyer when the buyer … equilibrium for this bargaining game with asymmetric information and outside options. It turns out that giving the seller an …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005063605
Punitive damage awards have been widely criticized for their unpredictability (2004 Economic Report of the President) and for generating a plaintiff’s windfall (i.e., a payment in excess of the costs of pursuing the punitive claim), which promotes unnecessary litigation (Dodson, 2000),...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005699597
In an attempt to reduce the liability insurance costs of firms, several US states have implemented many different kinds of tort reform. Some reforms take the form of caps or limits on punitive damage awards while others have mandated that a proportion of the award be allocated to the plaintiff...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005699599
consists of an individual decision-making problem (firm’s choice of level of care) and a bilateral (pre-trial) bargaining … significantly higher when bargaining is performed under the split-award institution. Defendant's litigation expenses and plaintiff …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005702607
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000344425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003587419
This paper reverses the standard order between input supply negotiations and downstream competition and assumes that competition for orders takes place prior to procurement of inputs in a vertical chain. In an environment where procurement negotiations involve no private information and no...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005130157
offers bargaining and repeated games. Despite the forces of bargaining, the negotiation game in general admits a large number … equilibria survive. Thus, complexity and bargaining in tandem may offer an explanation for co-operation in repeated games …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005342231
When a seller gives a buyer a right of first refusal, although it reduces the competing buyers' profits and creates an inefficiency, it always increases the joint profit of the seller and the right holder. Right of first refusal with a consideration (e.g., a payment from the right holder to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005342352