Showing 1 - 10 of 19
The empirical evidence of adverse selection in insurance markets is mixed. The problem in assessing the extent of adverse selection is that private information, on which agents act, is generally unobservable to the researcher, which makes it difficult to distinguish between adverse selection and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002570039
Micro data from a dental insurance natural experiment is used to analyze why agents opt out of insurance. The purpose is to relate the dropout decision to new information on risk, acquired by the policy holder and the insurer. The results show that agents tend to leave the insurance when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002570047
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000993768
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000994160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000962234
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000991640
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000935385
We consider a market-for-lemons model where the seller is a price setter, and, in addition to observing the price, the buyer receives a private noisy signal of the product's quality, such as when a prospective buyer looks at a car or house for sale, or when an employer interviews a job...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001913816
It is not unusual in real-life that one has to choose among finitely many alternatives when the merit of each alternative is not perfectly known. This may be the case when an individual chooses school, doctor or pension plan, or when a firm chooses between alternative R&D projects. Instead of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001959608
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000975039