Showing 1 - 10 of 283
The empirical evidence of adverse selection in insurance markets is mixed. The problem in assessing the extent of adverse selection is that private information, on which agents act, is generally unobservable to the researcher, which makes it difficult to distinguish between adverse selection and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002570039
Micro data from a dental insurance natural experiment is used to analyze why agents opt out of insurance. The purpose is to relate the dropout decision to new information on risk, acquired by the policy holder and the insurer. The results show that agents tend to leave the insurance when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002570047
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001604448
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000994164
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000987479
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000913988
We consider a leader and a subordinate he appoints who engage in team production. The public observes the organization's performance, but is unable to determine the separate contributions of the leader and of the subordinate. The leader may therefore claim credit for the good work of his...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001607828
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000987476
We consider a market-for-lemons model where the seller is a price setter, and, in addition to observing the price, the buyer receives a private noisy signal of the product's quality, such as when a prospective buyer looks at a car or house for sale, or when an employer interviews a job...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001913816
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000885969