Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005389585
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005389617
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005389687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005717333
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005717426
This paper has been superseded by WP 15-03. The authors study the location and productivity of more than 1,000 research and development (R&D) labs located in the Northeast corridor of the U.S. Using a variety of spatial econometric techniques, they find that these labs are substantially more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009320689
This paper has been superseded by WP 15-03.<p>The authors document the spatial concentration of more than 1,000 research and development (R&D) labs located in the Northeast corridor of the U.S. using point pattern methods. These methods allow systematic examination of clustering at different...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008691017
This paper has been superseded by WP 15-03. We study the location of more than 1,000 research and development (R&D) labs located in the Northeast corridor of the U.S. Using a variety of spatial econometric techniques, we find that these labs are substantially more concentrated in space than the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011133766
This study details the location patterns of R&D labs in the U.S., but it differs from past studies in a number of ways. First, rather than looking at the geographic concentration of manufacturing firms (e.g., Ellison and Glaeser, 1997; Rosenthal and Strange, 2001; and Duranton and Overman, 2005), the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004976677
During the early 1980s I estimated a highly disaggregated matrix of technology flows from U.S. industries that performed research and development (R&D) to industries expected to use the R&D outcomes. The results, extended to analyze how technology flows affected productivity growth in the 1960s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005389662