Showing 1 - 10 of 24
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003866132
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003866133
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009763800
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001599532
Aid fragmentation is widely denounced, though recent studies suggest potential benefits. To reconcile these mixed findings, we make a case for studying differences across aid sectors and levels of analysis. Our cross-national time-series analysis of data from 141 countries suggests aid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012514267
History has shown that openness to trade is a key ingredient for economic success and for improved living standards. But simply opening the economy to international trade is not enough. Developing countries – especially the least developed – require help in building their trade-related...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012449532
This Discussion Paper makes the case for universality in United Nations (UN) development work. So far, the UN development pillar has largely remained wedded to a 20th-century approach to development cooperation that centres on two groups of states and a one-way relationship between them: rich...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014575322
The transition to clean energy offers opportunities for developing economies and least-developed countries (LDCs) to exploit the export potential of this transition and to accelerate their growth prospects. The WTO-led Aid for Trade initiative provides significant support to these economies to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014578695
This study analyses the role of Aid for Trade in reducing trade costs in least developed countries (LDCs). The analysis builds on questionnaires and case stories submitted as part of the Aid-for-Trade monitoring and evaluation exercise for the Fifth Global Review of Aid for Trade. Trade costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012883254
Over the last two decades, national development agencies have committed to results-based approaches and to putting evidence at the centre of their decision-making. For evidence “optimists”, this is a much-needed corrective to past practice; in contrast, “pessimists” worry about ideology...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014225606