Showing 1 - 10 of 15
market. Using detailed matched employer-employee data, we analyze how firm takeovers and product market competition are …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005645318
sales price of a developed innovation. This will trigger preemptive acquisitions by incumbents, thus increasing the reward …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005025461
The purpose of this report is to contribute to the analysis of two questions. Should a merger control system take into account efficiency gains from horizontal mergers, and balance these gains against the anti-competitive effects of mergers? If so, how should a system be designed to account for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005670112
effects on the sales price. Moreover, preemptive acquisitions by incumbents are shown to stimulate the process of creative …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004964394
Private equity owned firms have more leverage, more intense compensation contracts, and higher productivity than comparable firms. We develop a theory of buyouts in oligopolistic markets that explains these facts. Private equity firms are more aggressive in inducing restructuring compared to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008476275
counterproductive, by preventing welfare-enhancing foreign acquisitions. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419497
This paper determines the equilibrium market structure in an international oligopoly which is opened up by a privatization. Market power is shown to be an important determinant of the equilibrium market structure, when greenfield investment costs are high. When the greenfield investment costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419531
We show that, in the case when innovations are for sale, increased product market competition, captured by reduced product market profits, can increase the incentives for innovations. The reason is that the incentive to innovate depends on the acquisition price which, in turn, might increase...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419538
Anticompetitive mergers increase competitors' profits, since they reduce competition. Using a model of endogenous mergers, we show that such mergers nevertheless may reduce the competitors' share-prices. Thus, event-studies can not detect anti-competitive mergers.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005639320
Anticompetitive mergers benefit competitors more than the merging firms. We show that such externalities reduce firms' incentives to merge (a holdup mechanism). Firms delay merger proposals, thereby foregoing valuable profits and hoping other firms will merge instead - a war of attrition. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005639334