Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Charness et al. (2007b) have shown that group membership has a strong effect on individualdecisions in strategic games when group membership is salient through payoff commonality.In this comment I show that their findings also apply to non-strategic decisions, even when nooutgroup exists, and I...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866444
Even though decision-making in small teams is pervasive in business and in private life, littleis known about subjects’ preferences with respect to individual and team decision-making andabout the consequences of respecting these preferences. We report the results from anexperimental...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866770
We examine the influence of team size on decision making in a beauty-contest experiment.Teams with four members outperform teams with two members and single personssignificantly, whereas the latter two types of decision makers do not differ.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866817
Economics has devoted little attention so far as to whether the type of decision maker matters for economic decisions. However, many important decisions like those on monetary policy or a company’s business strategy are made by (small) groups rather than an individual. We compare behaviour of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866848
We test for behavioral differences between groups and individuals in gift-exchange experiments. Related studies establish group behavior as typically closer to the game-theoretic equilibrium. We show that this result my depend crucially on the decision making procedure within groups. A novel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867021
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011528450
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011387014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011283858