show that the Chicago School Theory of a single monopoly surplus that justifies tying, bundling, and loyalty …I discuss the impact of tying, bundling, and loyalty/requirement rebates on consumer surplus in the affected markets. I …/requirement rebates on the basis of efficiency typically fails. Thus, tying, bundling, and loyalty/requirement rebates can be used to …

We discuss strategic ways that sellers can use tying and bundling with requirement conditions to extract consumer … surplus. We analyze different types of tying and bundling creating (i) intra-product price discrimination; (ii) intra … may entail. We also discuss the impact on consumers and competition, as well as potential antitrust liability of bundling …

We analyze and contrast the US and EU antitrust standards on mixed bundling and tying. We apply our analysis to the US … in the EU) with Windows as well as to cases brought in Europe and in the United States on bundling discounts. We conclude …

side” of the market) increases total industry surplus compared to the fully private optimum at which the monopoly platform …

side” of the market) increases total industry surplus compared to the fully private optimum at which the monopoly platform …

telecommunications: a monopoly of the local telecommunications network, as well as a monopoly in retail local telecommunications services … competitors. Thus, Verizon used its monopoly of the network infrastructure to disadvantage entrants in retail. In doing so … makes sense only insofar as it helps the defendant maintain or obtain monopoly power.” …